As you can see this is my blog. I did copy and paste from this blog, my own blog. I think we now know who the epic fail goes to.
Putz.
This is a case of a man who can't win an argument, so he tries to dig dirt. The reason why I posted the arguments from parts of my is because I'm lazy for one, what should I have done? Re-worded my points so they sound new? The second thing is the points I brought up have never been answered, even when posted on a comment board about a film singing the praises about the father of evolution (His explanation for the golden ratio of Phi for instance is it's a "coincidence").
I just got off with arguing with fundies about the bible on a different forum and I find the other extreme with these evolutionist shits. I don't know who's worse, the ones who believe the Bible with bad translations that tell them to hate others than themselves or the ones who can't take the idea they have someone greater than themselves they have to answer to and mock others who do.
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts
11 February 2014
14 December 2010
28 April 2010
02 February 2010
science after Stein
"Immoral," "Toxic," "Batshit Crazy," "Sleazy," and my personal favorite quote; "...loathsome piece of propaganda that has ever skulked its way into the theater." What documentary film are they talking about? It's a film that states that evolution is not what it's all cracked up to be and how and how you might lose your job if you say it out loud, but from these and other overkill quotes from film critics, you'd think it was a film denying the Holocaust or the killing of the poor. The film is called "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed." hosted by Ben Stein.
Ben Stein is annoying as fuck with his monotone way of speaking and looks like him, but the film isn't about Ben Stein or his shattering academy award worthy performance in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" (critics are having a field day playing up "Bueller" as if it somehow takes away from the points this documentary brings up. If Andrew McCarthy from the teen flick "Weekend at Bernie's" narrated a docu about Einstein, so what).
The beginning part of the film has interviews with several people (evolutionary biologist, astrophysicist, neurosurgeon professor, rising journalist, etc) who claimed they suffered the consequences of questioning the theory of evolution, with lose of job, smear campaigns, and blacklisting. of course the universities and institutions involved are going to deny that's the case because that would open them up to lawsuits every which way from Heaven, so they give excuses to the firings with saying everything but; "they kept on eating the bag lunches not their own in the teacher's lounge." These "expelled" that the film presents payed a painful price for not cow towing to the dogma of evolution and speaking their truth, and still do. When the film came out soon a website popped up questioning the claims of those spotlighted in the documentary (this page). Here's rabid evolutionist involved in character assassination again (see this page that counters what expelledexposed.com says about these individuals). Apart from those who came out in support of ID publicly, other scientist interviewed in silhouette on the documentary fearing they would lose their jobs if they came out publicly.
One thing the critics of the film don't touch is the mathematical improbability of evolution according to Molecular Biologist Doug Axe (he's not the first to bring up the mathematical improbability of evolution or even the best one, but he's the one discussing it on this film). According to him, life as we know it now coming from chance is 1 in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion. Evolutionist counter the mathematical argument with saying the only thing they can; "It's not IMPOSSIBLE." Well, yeah, NOTHING is impossible, but it's IMPROBABLE and that's what evolutionist don't get, do they even hear how seriously fucked up that sounds when they are the ones always bitching of wanting to stick to hard facts? It takes much more of a leap of faith with believing in a mathematical improbability this all came about by chance than to believe we were created by a creator we can't explain with our finite mind. I wish the film would have brought up the golden ratio of Phi that is found in everything from nature, to human DNA, to our solar system. Some believe it to be the signature of God, a mathematical stamp God put on everything that is the equivalent to our "Made in Taiwan" you see all over the place.
I do have one issue with the film, it's how evolution was the driving force to eugenics in Nazi Germany. There's no denying Hitler used Darwin to a twisted end, but Hitler used every excuse under the sun to annihilate every non-Aryan, Darwin was just another excuse, but it's interesting that the term "Eugenics" was coined by Darwin's cousin.
The evolutionist interviewed in the film, come off as sweaty, smarmy, fidgety, and cold, calling religion "evil" and those that believe in God "idiots." That's why some are now saying they were "hoodwinked " into appearing on the film, (the questions asked them were gone over before the interviews and were pre-approved by the participants by e-mail days before), they just don't like the fact they looking like the nasties they are and I notice none are suing the producers of the movie.
Stein in the film makes a case that ID believers, and even those who even give it the possibility of it being true, are stymied by those that think they know better.
Ben Stein is annoying as fuck with his monotone way of speaking and looks like him, but the film isn't about Ben Stein or his shattering academy award worthy performance in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" (critics are having a field day playing up "Bueller" as if it somehow takes away from the points this documentary brings up. If Andrew McCarthy from the teen flick "Weekend at Bernie's" narrated a docu about Einstein, so what).
The beginning part of the film has interviews with several people (evolutionary biologist, astrophysicist, neurosurgeon professor, rising journalist, etc) who claimed they suffered the consequences of questioning the theory of evolution, with lose of job, smear campaigns, and blacklisting. of course the universities and institutions involved are going to deny that's the case because that would open them up to lawsuits every which way from Heaven, so they give excuses to the firings with saying everything but; "they kept on eating the bag lunches not their own in the teacher's lounge." These "expelled" that the film presents payed a painful price for not cow towing to the dogma of evolution and speaking their truth, and still do. When the film came out soon a website popped up questioning the claims of those spotlighted in the documentary (this page). Here's rabid evolutionist involved in character assassination again (see this page that counters what expelledexposed.com says about these individuals). Apart from those who came out in support of ID publicly, other scientist interviewed in silhouette on the documentary fearing they would lose their jobs if they came out publicly.
One thing the critics of the film don't touch is the mathematical improbability of evolution according to Molecular Biologist Doug Axe (he's not the first to bring up the mathematical improbability of evolution or even the best one, but he's the one discussing it on this film). According to him, life as we know it now coming from chance is 1 in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion. Evolutionist counter the mathematical argument with saying the only thing they can; "It's not IMPOSSIBLE." Well, yeah, NOTHING is impossible, but it's IMPROBABLE and that's what evolutionist don't get, do they even hear how seriously fucked up that sounds when they are the ones always bitching of wanting to stick to hard facts? It takes much more of a leap of faith with believing in a mathematical improbability this all came about by chance than to believe we were created by a creator we can't explain with our finite mind. I wish the film would have brought up the golden ratio of Phi that is found in everything from nature, to human DNA, to our solar system. Some believe it to be the signature of God, a mathematical stamp God put on everything that is the equivalent to our "Made in Taiwan" you see all over the place.
I do have one issue with the film, it's how evolution was the driving force to eugenics in Nazi Germany. There's no denying Hitler used Darwin to a twisted end, but Hitler used every excuse under the sun to annihilate every non-Aryan, Darwin was just another excuse, but it's interesting that the term "Eugenics" was coined by Darwin's cousin.
The evolutionist interviewed in the film, come off as sweaty, smarmy, fidgety, and cold, calling religion "evil" and those that believe in God "idiots." That's why some are now saying they were "hoodwinked " into appearing on the film, (the questions asked them were gone over before the interviews and were pre-approved by the participants by e-mail days before), they just don't like the fact they looking like the nasties they are and I notice none are suing the producers of the movie.
Stein in the film makes a case that ID believers, and even those who even give it the possibility of it being true, are stymied by those that think they know better.
20 May 2009
Ida
Addendum 2/12/14.
So this bozo evolutionist named 'over the edge" is saying what I wrote on a page about a docu movie on Darwin is a rip off from this site and even goes as far as saying I better not try to say it's me. He sounds so triumphant about it, like he found the missing link evolutionist salivate over. I've written about the nastiness of evolution proponents and this tool is a shining example of that. And I thought MY grammar was bad.
"In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God."
-Charles Darwin.
Ida (a supposed "Missing Link") was heralded in the press today. Google even did a happy dance in her honor by making their banner to resemble a fossil in mud. This is what I think on this mess.
Ida being our Auntie ancestor is pure speculation and media hype at it's worst. Ida was not found yesterday, she was found in '83 and didn't warrant attention then. She, from what has been stated so far, is a lemur-type animal, from her racoon size body to her bushy tail, so what that does is make her a missing link between pro simians (read "lemurs") and simians (monkeys), not some kind of link from primate to human. The big selling point with Ida is that she has opposable thumbs (humans have opposable thumbs unlike most mammals), but guess who else has opposable thumbs? Lemurs. She also, unlike today's lemurs, lacks a “grooming claw” and her teeth are similiar to that of a primates instead of what is called a “toothcomb,” so what does that make Ida? An extinct type of lemur without a grooming claw and a toothcomb, nothing more. Keep in mind that every few years these kinds of hyped claims of a "Missing Link" are made and everytime these claims are found to have holes in them the size of dinner plates given time.
Let's get this straight, evolution is a perfect example of “If you say something long enough, people will believe it.” It’s so widely accepted because it’s taught to us at such a young age. It’s so ingrained in our society, theory has turned into fact.
Evolution states that organisms adapt to their environment via natural selection, but natural selection is an oxymoron. What or who chooses which traits will be beneficial? If it’s a case of trial and error over eons of time, there should be mass graveyards of what’s left of transitional junk animals that just couldn’t cut it. Instead we have a handfull of questionable bones that evolutionists trot out like it’s the second coming. They say it’s EXACTLY because of those long eons you won’t find the graveyards, but the massive amount of time natural selection supposedly needed to work it’s magic doesn’t matter because you still have to explain the theory as coming from randomness. Randomness begets chaos no matter the timeframe and only consciousness can manipulate matter and reverse chaos.
Former evolutionists and scientists like Phillip Skell, Stephen Meyers, and Henry Schaefer, who have embraced Intelligent Design, have gone through a nightmare of vicious personal attacks from the science community; yet their credentials are never questioned, why? because they’re impeccable. From the media, however, you get the idea that all I.D. believers are from the backwoods of Arkansas. I hate how evolution has become such a stumbling block to people’s faith when it really doesn’t need to be. Extinct, before unknown, primates and extinct lemur-type animals does not evolution make.
Now talk to God.
link
So this bozo evolutionist named 'over the edge" is saying what I wrote on a page about a docu movie on Darwin is a rip off from this site and even goes as far as saying I better not try to say it's me. He sounds so triumphant about it, like he found the missing link evolutionist salivate over. I've written about the nastiness of evolution proponents and this tool is a shining example of that. And I thought MY grammar was bad.
"In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God."
-Charles Darwin.
Ida (a supposed "Missing Link") was heralded in the press today. Google even did a happy dance in her honor by making their banner to resemble a fossil in mud. This is what I think on this mess.
Ida being our Auntie ancestor is pure speculation and media hype at it's worst. Ida was not found yesterday, she was found in '83 and didn't warrant attention then. She, from what has been stated so far, is a lemur-type animal, from her racoon size body to her bushy tail, so what that does is make her a missing link between pro simians (read "lemurs") and simians (monkeys), not some kind of link from primate to human. The big selling point with Ida is that she has opposable thumbs (humans have opposable thumbs unlike most mammals), but guess who else has opposable thumbs? Lemurs. She also, unlike today's lemurs, lacks a “grooming claw” and her teeth are similiar to that of a primates instead of what is called a “toothcomb,” so what does that make Ida? An extinct type of lemur without a grooming claw and a toothcomb, nothing more. Keep in mind that every few years these kinds of hyped claims of a "Missing Link" are made and everytime these claims are found to have holes in them the size of dinner plates given time.
Let's get this straight, evolution is a perfect example of “If you say something long enough, people will believe it.” It’s so widely accepted because it’s taught to us at such a young age. It’s so ingrained in our society, theory has turned into fact.
Evolution states that organisms adapt to their environment via natural selection, but natural selection is an oxymoron. What or who chooses which traits will be beneficial? If it’s a case of trial and error over eons of time, there should be mass graveyards of what’s left of transitional junk animals that just couldn’t cut it. Instead we have a handfull of questionable bones that evolutionists trot out like it’s the second coming. They say it’s EXACTLY because of those long eons you won’t find the graveyards, but the massive amount of time natural selection supposedly needed to work it’s magic doesn’t matter because you still have to explain the theory as coming from randomness. Randomness begets chaos no matter the timeframe and only consciousness can manipulate matter and reverse chaos.
Former evolutionists and scientists like Phillip Skell, Stephen Meyers, and Henry Schaefer, who have embraced Intelligent Design, have gone through a nightmare of vicious personal attacks from the science community; yet their credentials are never questioned, why? because they’re impeccable. From the media, however, you get the idea that all I.D. believers are from the backwoods of Arkansas. I hate how evolution has become such a stumbling block to people’s faith when it really doesn’t need to be. Extinct, before unknown, primates and extinct lemur-type animals does not evolution make.
Now talk to God.
link
29 March 2009
Dazed and Confused
One of the first people to comment on my blog, other than the lovely Meagan and the mysterious Emma, was a gay Atheist. Everything was all fine and dandy until the topic of God came up. Make a long story short, he turned to insulting me personally instead of sticking to the subject at hand and I made him disappear from my blog like a magic trick. Now normally I would rip someone a new asshole for that, but I didn't with him, maybe because I saw hurt behind his words, or maybe because he was from my "tribe," I don't know. The thing with Atheists is this collective anger and obsessiveness they seem to share with the concept of a God they claim not to believe in. He wasn't the first Atheist I came across, but he was the first homosexual one I dealt with. I told him, because he fit the mold, that all the Atheists I have dealt in the past were, for the most part, angry, patronizing, and insulting (they refer to God as "Flying Spaghetti Monster" and Jesus as "Jeebus." They know it's going to get under people's skin, but they do it anyways) and they believe they are just so much more enlightened than the rest of us boobs who are just too stupid or too afraid to get away from our "God Trip." Even if God were not real it says more about them and their sick glee with trying to pop my "God Bubble" than what it says about me and my God belief. Atheism has a strong foothold with the homosexual community because they see what is called an 'Ugly Christian" with all his anti-gay rhetoric and they are poisoned to the whole concept of the God of Genesis, Jesus, or anything smelling of Peter, Paul, or Mary ("I hate God because He hated me first" is the sub-conscious underpinning behind it). Because I'm gay doesn't mean I'm going to leave my Bible at the door, that's men telling me to do that, not God.
One man wrote how he lost his faith (he later wrote a book trying to debunk the Bible with old shit that was already talked about by better writers and refuted). He describes it as little black bubbles that just started to leave him and by the time the last bubble left, every speck of faith in a God left with it. I don't know why bubbles leave, or why you would let them, but I do know I have mine in a tight jam jar (grape), wrapped in plastic, with a few telephone books on top in case they try to make a getaway. God didn't leave me when I stopped being the Christian I was and become what I am now, I'm going to show Him the same courtesy.
One man wrote how he lost his faith (he later wrote a book trying to debunk the Bible with old shit that was already talked about by better writers and refuted). He describes it as little black bubbles that just started to leave him and by the time the last bubble left, every speck of faith in a God left with it. I don't know why bubbles leave, or why you would let them, but I do know I have mine in a tight jam jar (grape), wrapped in plastic, with a few telephone books on top in case they try to make a getaway. God didn't leave me when I stopped being the Christian I was and become what I am now, I'm going to show Him the same courtesy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
